Media Contact

David Gwidt, Communications Director, dgwidt@aclu-wi.org

MILWAUKEE— The ACLU of Wisconsin issued the following statement after Milwaukee Police Chief Jeffrey Norman announced today that he would no longer consider a proposal to acquire facial recognition technology and would instead prohibit the department from using the technology.

The move comes after Milwaukeeans packed a Fire and Police Commission meeting Thursday night, testifying for almost three hours against a proposed agreement with Biometrica that would have provided the Milwaukee Police Department with two “free” software licenses in exchange for millions of images and data from Milwaukeeans.

Amanda Merkwae, Advocacy Director at the ACLU of Wisconsin, said the following:

“Thanks to an outpouring of public opposition, Milwaukee Police Chief Jeffrey Norman announced that he will no longer seek to acquire facial recognition technology and will ban its use within the department. While this is certainly welcome news, it is still incumbent upon Chief Norman to prove that MPD will follow through on the moratorium.

For years, Milwaukee Police have used facial recognition in secret despite publicly claiming otherwise. Under immense public pressure, MPD officials have admitted to borrowing facial recognition technology from other jurisdictions without any internal policy in place, unbeknownst to the Fire and Police Commission, for at least two or three years, meaning that Milwaukee police have been using a tool that allows them to identify, track, and monitor people in public spaces without consent, notice, or meaningful accountability.

For the past nine months, countless Milwaukee residents and community leaders have engaged in thoughtful community education, spent hours upon hours in public meetings, and contacted their local elected officials to voice their unequivocal opposition to the use of FRT. This step forward is a testament to that work.

However, given the department’s lack of transparency concerning FRT, we must remain vigilant and continue to hold MPD accountable. This ban can’t just be lip service or a hollow gesture meant to ease public backlash. It must actually mark an end to the use of facial recognition by Milwaukee police.”

Related Content

Campaign
Feb 2026
Collage of fist, protest, and police
  • Privacy, Technology, and Liberty|
  • +1 Issue

Community Control Over Police Surveillance

Local law enforcement’s use of surveillance technology, which in most places has occurred without any community input or control, presents significant threats to civil liberties.
Press Release
Apr 17, 2025
Press Release
  • First Amendment|
  • +1 Issue

ACLU of Wisconsin Sends Letter to Milwaukee Common Council About Surveillance Technology

We wrote an open letter to the Common Council calling for a two-year pause on the adoption of any new surveillance technology.
News & Commentary
May 24, 2024
Collage of an eye, a surveillance camera, and a phone
  • Privacy, Technology, and Liberty|
  • +1 Issue

Which Surveillance Technologies are Used in Milwaukee?

Here’s what we know and don’t know. One thing is clear: the Milwaukee community deserves transparency and control over how technology is being used.
News & Commentary
Nov 25, 2025
Placeholder image
  • Criminal Legal Reform|
  • +1 Issue

Police Surveillance is Ripe for Abuse

Greenfield police chief allegedly weaponizes surveillance camera in divorce — BIG red flag.