By Gianna Molini

 

In 4th grade, I was nearing the end of the school year, and I had decided to wear my favorite pair of bright purple shorts to school. As I headed to class, I was pulled aside by my teacher. She asked me, “Honey, do you have a change of clothing in your locker?” Like any nine year-old girl would, I looked at her in confusion. I didn’t understand what the problem was. As a teenager, I now see that my prepubescent body wearing shorts on a hot day was, in her perception, a “taboo”. This was the first of many times that I would be taken aside and later even pulled out of class for wearing “inappropriate” or “provocative” clothing.

I was in 6th grade and going through major transitions into pre-teen hood. A new school, new friends, new changes occurring within my body and my mind. I was never one to keep up with middle school trends but one trend in particular stands out in my mind — “Slap-Ass Friday.” It was the holy grail of weekdays for boys who wanted to grope  their female classmates under the relative anonymity of a crowded school hallway. After I and other classmates were subjected to these non-consensual intrusions, I did the thing that I’ve been taught to do in cases like these. I went to a teacher and told her the names of the boys who were committing these acts, expecting for them to get suspended or reprimanded in some way. The following Monday, I returned to school. I prematurely felt relief because I thought I wouldn’t get grabbed without my consent for at least another week. I was so wrong. Not only were those boys not reprimanded, but completely out of nowhere there was a mandatory dress code review in class that day — something that had never happened before. During that class time, instead of being taught arithmetic, I was taught about how I was responsible for my own sexual harassment. The dress code was the first tool that society ever used on me to get me to mold my behavior so that boys wouldn’t have to change theirs.

As a high schooler, my most recent experiences with a problematic dress code have resulted in a more pointedly negative dynamic than I ever imagined. It has caused a major disruption in the relationship between my teachers and I as academic symbiotes and a turn toward seeing them as body police who are sexualizing my form. This was caused by their sharp attention to petty infractions such as a hint of my bra strap showing or a tiny sliver of midriff being momentarily visible between my shirt and my jeans. I’ve grown to understand that my educators respect me enough to believe that I am capable of academic success but not enough to believe that I am capable of making my own decisions regarding “appropriate” attire.

Over the last year, fellow students and I have made the push towards a revised dress code that is designed not to inadvertently body-shame or victim-blame. It took an entire campaign of re-education for many of the adults in our community to understand the depth and validity of this issue but we finally did it. On top of gender oppression, ableism is also woven into badly designed dress-codes. Parents all over our district wrote to say how certain restrictions affected their children with disabilities as well. Our school board passed the new dress code unanimously after over a year of heated contention. I’m elated for all of the little girls across my district in Kenosha who won’t have to deal with a dress code that disproportionately affects their education and sense of self. However, in this time of victory I am reminded of the little girls all over the country who are still being harmed by their oppressive dress codes. I urge everyone, everywhere to take a look at your dress codes and ask yourselves if they can be made fairer. And if so, then what’s stopping you?

 

Date

Thursday, May 24, 2018 - 12:15pm

Featured image

Gianna Molini, High School Student

Show featured image

Hide banner image

Tweet Text

[node:title]

Related issues

Education Equity

Show related content

Menu parent dynamic listing

22

Style

Standard with sidebar

Because of concern for resegregation of Milwaukee’s public schools, this week I attended a meeting of the Milwaukee Board of School Directors on behalf of ACLU. Over the years I have been to many such meetings when the MPS Board has considered matters that affect the opportunity for an integrated education.  This week’s consideration of cutting or limiting bussing to the schools that were established in the late 1970’s and early 80’s to encourage voluntary integration was both encouraging and at the same time sobering.  The outpouring of support for integrated education was poignant and heart felt.  Parents, teachers, principals, and students testified about the diversity and inclusiveness that they fear they would lose if the district decided not to continue providing transportation to MPS specialty schools.  They testified about how the future of the French, German, Spanish and Italian immersion schools and the languages high school hangs in the balance.  Restricting support for children whose parents could not afford or provide transportation would lead to declined enrollment.  Decline in enrollment will reduce funds that support these highly successful schools.  Schools that attract students from Milwaukee’s suburbs as far away as West Bend would be weakened.

When I got my chance to speak I urged the board to obtain an analysis of the impact of any proposals to change the availability of transportation on the opportunity to obtain an integrated education.  I noted that while others who spoke generally did not use the term “integrated”.  I urged the board to look not just at desegregation but at the more positive goal of integration.  Like many others I spoke about how my sons’ experience at Golda Meier, MacDowell Montessori, and Roosevelt Middle School for the Arts greatly enriched their lives.  I reminded the Board that the equal educational opportunity is not just good policy, it is a legal right guaranteed by the US and Wisconsin Constitutions.

What was sobering to me, though, was that proposals that would reduce integrated educational opportunities were being considered.  Many of the speakers referred to the history of efforts to desegregate Milwaukee Public Schools and the significant role that the provision of transportation (bussing) played and still plays in the effort. In the 1970’s and 1980’s opposition to bussing was often motivated by racial animus and opposition to desegregation.  That does not appear to be the motivation for the current proposals.  They are proposed as ways to reduce spending and help close a significant gap in funding. The fiscal challenges of MPS, however, are in part a result of inadequate state funding for MPS, the school district that is responsible for educating the bulk of the State’s African American, Hispanic and other children of color, and its students for which English is a second language. Speakers at the school board meeting urged that other ways be explored to close the funding gap.  A proposal to fill the gap by lowering the proposal for raising teachers’ salaries was not well received by those who testified.  Many pointed out that reducing teacher pay pits teachers against students and the families who want to keep integrated educational opportunities available.  Others expressed concern that taxpayer funding of voucher schools was contributing to the funding gap and the need to consider reducing transportation to integrated schools.

The battle for integrated schools is decades old, but it is a battle that must still be fought.  It was heartening to see that the struggle to end racial isolation with all its adverse consequences is still underway.

 

By Bill Lynch

Bill Lynch was the Executive Director of the ACLU of Wisconsin when the Federal Court in Milwaukee ordered MPS to desegregate its schools in 1976.  He represented community groups that unsuccessfully challenged the settlement of that case because it did not promise to eliminate all black schools.  He also represented the NAACP in the metropolitan school desegregation case.  He has been a member of the ACLU of Wisconsin Board of Directors since 1979.

Date

Monday, April 23, 2018 - 12:00pm

Featured image

Young protesters

Show featured image

Hide banner image

Tweet Text

[node:title]

Related issues

Education Equity

Show related content

Menu parent dynamic listing

22

Style

Standard with sidebar

The American Civil Liberties Union of Wisconsin has hired Milwaukee native Sean Wilson as its Smart Justice statewide organizer.  Sean is an activist who grew up in Milwaukee’s 53206 neighborhood.  As a formerly incarcerated person, Sean knows all too well the outcome of poor decisions – and has made a vow to advocate for justice, and also teach young people how to problem solve and create better conditions for themselves.

“As someone that has lived experiences with the criminal justice system in this state, I feel that my path has ultimately placed me in a unique position to help others, and make progress for real reform,” Sean said.  “I am an advocate for change and because I have endured struggles, I want my presence to be a liberating encounter for youth and all who feel they have no options. My favorite quote, ‘if there is no struggle, there is no progress’ [Frederick Douglass], not only exemplifies my life personally, but now also in my role at the ACLU.” 

 “Sean will help build the ACLU’s Smart Justice campaign in Wisconsin to decrease the number of people in prison.  He will play a critical role in leading this work and will help ensure that people impacted by problems in today’s criminal justice system lead the ACLU’s work on criminal justice reform,” said Chris Ott, ACLU of Wisconsin executive director.

The ACLU’s Campaign for Smart Justice is committed to realizing a new criminal justice system – one that is substantially smaller than its current size while also keeping communities safe, advancing racial justice, treating people fairly, and using fiscal resources wisely.

The American Civil Liberties Union of Wisconsin has hired Milwaukee native Sean Wilson as its Smart Justice statewide organizer.  Sean is an activist who grew up in Milwaukee’s 53206 neighborhood.  As a formerly incarcerated person, Sean knows all too well the outcome of poor decisions – and has made a vow to advocate for justice, and also teach young people how to problem solve and create better conditions for themselves.

“As someone that has lived experiences with the criminal justice system in this state, I feel that my path has ultimately placed me in a unique position to help others, and make progress for real reform,” Sean said.  “I am an advocate for change and because I have endured struggles, I want my presence to be a liberating encounter for youth and all who feel they have no options. My favorite quote, ‘if there is no struggle, there is no progress’ [Frederick Douglass], not only exemplifies my life personally, but now also in my role at the ACLU.” 

 “Sean will help build the ACLU’s Smart Justice campaign in Wisconsin to decrease the number of people in prison.  He will play a critical role in leading this work and will help ensure that people impacted by problems in today’s criminal justice system lead the ACLU’s work on criminal justice reform,” said Chris Ott, ACLU of Wisconsin executive director.

The ACLU’s Campaign for Smart Justice is committed to realizing a new criminal justice system – one that is substantially smaller than its current size while also keeping communities safe, advancing racial justice, treating people fairly, and using fiscal resources wisely.

Date

Friday, May 25, 2018 - 12:00pm

Featured image

Sean Wilson, Smart Justice Statewide Organizer

Show featured image

Hide banner image

Tweet Text

[node:title]

Show related content

Menu parent dynamic listing

22

Style

Standard with sidebar

Pages

Subscribe to ACLU of Wisconsin RSS