WUWM: Wisconsin Lesbian Couple Fights for Both Names to be on Child’s Birth Certificate

Karina Willes and Kami Young were married in Minnesota in late 2013. The spring of the next year, Young gave birth to their daughter, Olivia. And Willes attempted to get her name included on the girl’s birth certificate, receiving advice from the ACLU on how to do that.  

By mcollins

Placeholder image

Important things to know about Voter ID (from GAB)

Important things to know about Voter ID (from the Government Accountability Board)

By mcollins

Wisconsin Gazette: ACLU goes back to court, Wants to guarantee both parents in a same-sex couple must be listed on Wisconsin birth certificates

Written by The Wisconsin Gazette Tuesday, 21 April 2015 04:50

By mcollins

Placeholder image

ACLU asks State to Recognize Same-Sex Couples’ right to be on Birth Certificates of their Children

The American Civil Liberties Union of Wisconsin, the ACLU LGBT Project, along with attorneys from Mayer Brown filed a motion today in the case of Wolf v. Walker asking the U.S. District Court to clarify that both parents in a same-sex married couple must be listed on the birth certificates of children born while they are married.  The ACLU is filing the motion on behalf of Kami Young and Karina Willes, who had married in Minnesota before their daughter was born last year.

By mcollins

Recording Police Activity

On July 24, 2014, Milwaukee's Fire and Police Commission (FPC) approved Standard Operating Procedure 755: Recording Police Activity.  The policy provides guidance to the Milwaukee Police Department for situations in which they are being recorded by members of the public or media, which is a constitutionally-protected activity.  This right has been upheld by the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals as recently as 2012 in ACLU vs. Alvarez, a case in which individuals and organizations that wanted to monitor police activity in order to detect police misconduct were prosecuted under the law.

By mcollins

2014 Election Protection Report

A copy of the Wisconsin Election Protection Report on the November 2014 Elections can be found here. The League of Women Voters Election observer report can be found here.

By mcollins

Milwaukee Courier: Get Your IDs, Wisconsin

By Tiffany Crouse

By mcollins

Placeholder image

More DNA Data a Costly Dragnet

On April 1, 2015 Wisconsin dramatically expanded its grounds allowing law enforcement agencies to take Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) samples from people.  Those arrested for violent felonies once probable cause is established, or convicted of a misdemeanor crime committed after April 1, will have to submit a DNA sample.   Previously, Wisconsin took approximately 12,000 DNA samples from persons convicted of certain felonies.  Under the new scheme it is estimated there will be 25,000 additional DNA samples taken for violent felonies and 40,000 additional samples taken after misdemeanor convictions.   The ACLU acknowledges that there are legitimate purposes for forensic DNA.  Numerous pri

By mcollins

Transit in Transition

This response was written by Karyn Rotker, Senior Staff Attorney with the ACLU of Wisconsin, for the story, "Transportation advocates offer differing perspectives on urban transit issues" which appeared in the Neighborhood News Service. 1.)  How should transportation planning and projects be prioritized to meet the needs of central city residents (i.e., the reconstruction of I-94 west, the streetcar and the bus service)? All transportation planning needs to consider the needs of communities of color, and ensure that those communities get a fair share of the benefits of transportation system investments and do not experience disproportionate burdens. See, e.g., Federal Highway Admin.  Guidance on Environmental Justice and NEPA,  http://environment.fhwa.dot.gov/projdev/guidance_ej_nepa.asp  ("Compare the impacts on the minority and/or low-income populations with respect to the impacts on the overall population within the project area. Fair distribution of the beneficial and adverse effects of the proposed action is the desired outcome"). The I-94 E/W expansion, as proposed, fails this test: it does not provide communities of color with a fair share of transportation system investments and it imposes disproportionate burdens on them - by not providing transit, by facilitating (segregated) suburban sprawl, by loss of business, jobs and neighborhood damage, and by adverse health and air quality effects. As SEWRPC noted in its 2006 long range plan, it was necessary for transit to increase at the same rate as highway construction/reconstruction, in particular to benefit communities of color and low income communities. That has not occurred, and it needs to. 2.)  Budget cuts have resulted in service cutbacks and fewer riders on city buses. Now options like signal priority and bus-rapid-transit are available to improve bus scheduling. Do you favor a more robust bus system with new routes and ?  If so, how should it be funded? We believe that all options to create a more robust transit system - including more robust bus service - should be considered. We also believe that one funding source that should be considered for such capital investments is the federal Surface Transportation Program (STP). This is the federal program that funds much of the highway construction/rebuilding, but under federal law these funds also could be used ("flexed") to support transit capital investments. http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/map21/factsheets/stp.cfm ("Eligible activities .  . . .Construction, reconstruction, rehabilitation, resurfacing, restoration, preservation, or operational improvements for highways . . . .Capital costs for transit projects eligible for assistance under chapter 53 of title 49 [that would include Milw Co Transit] . . . .Highway and transit safety infrastructure improvements and programs. . . .Highway and transit research, development, technology transfer.. . . .") There is also a need for increased state funding, as well as for the state to allow a local/regional funding source for transit operating expenses. Milwaukee is one of the only large metropolitan areas that is forced to use property taxes to support transit, with no specialized funding mechanism. We are not taking a position on precisely which mechanism is used for state/local funding, but such a mechanism needs to be created. 3.)  Wisconsin legislators have been known to characterize public transportation as "social service" and prioritize planning and funding accordingly.  Other states treat transportation as an economic development tool.  Which is it?  Please explain your view. Transit is a form of transportation and needs to be given the same priorities and support as other forms of transportation - such as highway construction. If capital investments are properly implemented (e.g., bus rapid transit) it can be an economic development tool as well, and it is critical that communities of color benefit from such investments (both in the short term - e.g., by getting jobs and contracts on the construction - and in the long term, through neighborhood improvments).  It is also, of course, a critical method to connect workers and job seekers with jobs, to get students to school, to get residents to health care and recreation, etc.  4.)  Do you favor the streetcar project as it currently stands ... Yes, No?  Why? We have not taken a formal position on the streetcar project. However, we believe that there is a need to develop a method to provide jobs in construction of this project to central city workers.

By mcollins