RELIGIOUS FREEDOM VERSUS DISCRIMINATION
I was raised Lutheran (in a more liberal synod) and I believe in religious freedom. One of the ways the United States has lessened problems of religious intolerance is by separating public money from the promotion of specific religious views that may deeply offend and discriminate against people of other belief systems.
The pastors of the St. Marcus church should be free to promote their religious views. But public policy is governed by principles of democracy. Should the taxpayers of Wisconsin be expected to fund the WELS’ homophobic, anti-woman beliefs and its teaching of pseudo-science such as creationism?
Since 1998, the St. Marcus School has received almost $22 million in public tax dollars via the voucher program, according to figures from the state
Department of Public Instruction.
In the 2012-13 school year, 89 percent of the students at St. Marcus received a publicly funded voucher, according to the
Public Policy Forum. This, in turn, calls into question why religious voucher schools, some of whom have all their students receiving publicly funded vouchers, are defined as a “private” school.
St. Marcus School wants to use the former Malcolm X school to enroll an additional 900 students — which could bring in an additional $6 million a year in public funding.
It’s a travesty that the Milwaukee mainstream media has never seriously investigated the curriculum at private voucher schools, and whether the schools may be promoting beliefs that run counter to state anti-discrimination laws that all public schools must follow.
As for the St. Marcus School, there has been no public discussion of how the school essentially operates as a white-led, patriarchal organization serving predominantly African American students, and without even a minimal nod toward democratic principles. (The colonial, missionary aspects of the St. Marcus School operations are disturbing, but that’s for another column.)
SCHOOL BOARD HEARING
The St. Marcus School has launched a public campaign, demanding that Milwaukee Public Schools (MPS) sell to St. Marcus the former Malcolm X middle school, which encompasses an entire city block. The controversy was discussed at a public hearing before the MPS school board on Thursday, Sept. 12. Several hundred people showed up.
The School Board already has plans for the former Malcolm X building. It has been working for several years with community leaders, business people and government officials from the Bronzeville neighborhood to create a multi-use venue with low-income housing, a cultural and artist center and a school.
At the public hearing, one of the issues raised was that public schools are inherently more democratic, transparent and accountable than private schools.
Every MPS school, for instance, is
required to have a democratically elected school council. The majority of the council is comprised of students’ parents or caregivers, and elected by the school’s parents/caregivers. The council also includes the principal and teacher representatives elected by their peers, and at least one community member elected by fellow council members. At high schools, students have a democratically elected representative. Discrimination on the basis of race, gender, sexual orientation or religion is illegal.
St. Marcus operates differently. According to the St. Marcus School
charter, the school council is appointed by the church board of directors. According to the St. Marcus church’s
bylaws, the church’s board of directors must be men.
Under church
bylaws, directors must be “a voting member of the congregation.” If you read the fine print, you will find that only men can be voting members. As the St. Marcus church
constitution notes, “Voting members are
male [emphasis added] communicant members at least 18 years of age. The voting members shall comprise the voters’ assembly.”
The St. Marcus church
bylaws further stipulate that “directors shall be a voting member of the congregation.”
So, according to church regulations, only male members of the St. Marcus church elect the church board of directors. These directors, in turn, must be men. And they, in turn, appoint the St. Marcus School Council. The chair of the council must be a “voting member,” — i.e., a male. Other school council members must be church members, and can presumably include women.
Yes, it gets a bit complicated — bylaws tend to be written that way. But the bottom line is clear: men make the decisions and women are not to have authority over men. It’s hard in this day and age to find a clearer example of patriarchy.
In a democracy, why should the public be expected to fund institutions that, as a matter of principle, deny women the right to vote?